Hunter Club

Suffolk

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Hunter Club scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 3 October 2019 by West Suffolk.

What does this rating mean?

Hunter Club in Suffolk has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

65 Guildhall Street,
Bury St Edmunds,
Suffolk,
IP33 1QF

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Hunter Club. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Hunter Club?

Food hygiene at Hunter Club is inspected by West Suffolk, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.westsuffolk.gov.uk or food&[email protected].

Questions about Hunter Club

What is Hunter Club’s food hygiene rating?

Hunter Club has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 3 October 2019.

When was Hunter Club last inspected?

Hunter Club was last inspected by West Suffolk on 3 October 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.