The Anchor

Kent

Food hygiene rating 2 / 5 · Improvement necessary

Bit dodgy, this one

The Anchor scored just 2 out of 5 at its last inspection. Maybe think twice before ordering.

The breakdown

Hygiene Generally satisfactory Cleanliness & condition Improvement necessary Confidence in management Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 5 August 2020 by Swale.

What does this rating mean?

The Anchor in Kent has a food hygiene rating of 2 out of 5 (improvement necessary). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 2 out of 5 means some improvement was necessary at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Abbey Street,
Faversham,
Kent,
ME13 7BL

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Anchor. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Anchor?

Food hygiene at The Anchor is inspected by Swale, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.swale.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about The Anchor

What is The Anchor’s food hygiene rating?

The Anchor has a food hygiene rating of 2 out of 5 (Improvement necessary), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 5 August 2020.

When was The Anchor last inspected?

The Anchor was last inspected by Swale on 5 August 2020.

Is a 2 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 2 out of 5 means some improvement was necessary at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.