Nana Jo's Bakes

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Nana Jo's Bakes scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 7 December 2017 by South Oxfordshire.

What does this rating mean?

Nana Jo's Bakes has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Nana Jo's Bakes. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Nana Jo's Bakes?

Food hygiene at Nana Jo's Bakes is inspected by South Oxfordshire, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at https://www.southoxon.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Nana Jo's Bakes

What is Nana Jo's Bakes’s food hygiene rating?

Nana Jo's Bakes has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 7 December 2017.

When was Nana Jo's Bakes last inspected?

Nana Jo's Bakes was last inspected by South Oxfordshire on 7 December 2017.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.