Elliots

Rotherham

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Elliots scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Generally satisfactory Cleanliness & condition Generally satisfactory Confidence in management Very good

Last inspected on 22 February 2019 by Rotherham.

What does this rating mean?

Elliots in Rotherham has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

9 Westgate,
Rotherham,
S60 1AN

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Elliots. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Elliots?

Food hygiene at Elliots is inspected by Rotherham, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.rotherham.gov.uk or food.health&[email protected].

Questions about Elliots

What is Elliots’s food hygiene rating?

Elliots has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 22 February 2019.

When was Elliots last inspected?

Elliots was last inspected by Rotherham on 22 February 2019.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.