Cedar Court

Reading

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Cedar Court scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 17 December 2018 by Reading.

What does this rating mean?

Cedar Court in Reading has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

30 Whitley Rise,
Reading,
RG2 0NS

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Cedar Court. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Cedar Court?

Food hygiene at Cedar Court is inspected by Reading, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.reading.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Cedar Court

What is Cedar Court’s food hygiene rating?

Cedar Court has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 17 December 2018.

When was Cedar Court last inspected?

Cedar Court was last inspected by Reading on 17 December 2018.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.