The Chulmleigh Bakery

Devon

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The Chulmleigh Bakery scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

What does this rating mean?

The Chulmleigh Bakery in Devon has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

East Street,
Chulmleigh,
Devon,
EX18 7DD

The Chulmleigh Bakery Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Chulmleigh Bakery. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Chulmleigh Bakery?

Food hygiene at The Chulmleigh Bakery is inspected by North Devon, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.northdevon.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about The Chulmleigh Bakery

What is The Chulmleigh Bakery’s food hygiene rating?

The Chulmleigh Bakery has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 27 February 2020.

When was The Chulmleigh Bakery last inspected?

The Chulmleigh Bakery was last inspected by North Devon on 27 February 2020.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.