Redwood Beach

Ilfracombe

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Redwood Beach scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 10 May 2019 by North Devon.

What does this rating mean?

Redwood Beach in Ilfracombe has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Seaside,
Combe Martin,
Ilfracombe,
Devon,
EX34 0DJ

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Redwood Beach. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Redwood Beach?

Food hygiene at Redwood Beach is inspected by North Devon, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.northdevon.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Redwood Beach

What is Redwood Beach’s food hygiene rating?

Redwood Beach has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 10 May 2019.

When was Redwood Beach last inspected?

Redwood Beach was last inspected by North Devon on 10 May 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.