The Scotts Arms

North Yorkshire

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The Scotts Arms scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Good

Last inspected on 8 October 2018 by Harrogate.

What does this rating mean?

The Scotts Arms in North Yorkshire has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Main Street,
Sicklinghall,
North Yorkshire,
LS22 4BD

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Scotts Arms. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Scotts Arms?

Food hygiene at The Scotts Arms is inspected by Harrogate, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.harrogate.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about The Scotts Arms

What is The Scotts Arms’s food hygiene rating?

The Scotts Arms has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 8 October 2018.

When was The Scotts Arms last inspected?

The Scotts Arms was last inspected by Harrogate on 8 October 2018.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.