Tea Darling

London

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Tea Darling scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 23 March 2019 by Ealing.

What does this rating mean?

Tea Darling in London has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

114 Churchfield Road,
Acton,
London,
W3 6BY

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Tea Darling. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Tea Darling?

Food hygiene at Tea Darling is inspected by Ealing, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at https://www.ealing.gov.uk/info/201150/food_hygiene_and_safety or [email protected].

Questions about Tea Darling

What is Tea Darling’s food hygiene rating?

Tea Darling has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 23 March 2019.

When was Tea Darling last inspected?

Tea Darling was last inspected by Ealing on 23 March 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.