Saltwells Inn

Brierley Hill

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Saltwells Inn scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Very good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 14 February 2022 by Dudley.

What does this rating mean?

Saltwells Inn in Brierley Hill has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Saltwells Lane,
Quarry Bank,
Brierley Hill,
DY5 1AX

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Saltwells Inn. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Saltwells Inn?

Food hygiene at Saltwells Inn is inspected by Dudley, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.dudley.gov.uk.

Questions about Saltwells Inn

What is Saltwells Inn’s food hygiene rating?

Saltwells Inn has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 14 February 2022.

When was Saltwells Inn last inspected?

Saltwells Inn was last inspected by Dudley on 14 February 2022.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.