Seaview Inn

Cornwall

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Seaview Inn scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Very good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 19 June 2025 by Cornwall.

What does this rating mean?

Seaview Inn in Cornwall has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Wodehouse Terrace,
Falmouth,
Cornwall,
TR11 3EP

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Seaview Inn. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Seaview Inn?

Food hygiene at Seaview Inn is inspected by Cornwall, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.cornwall.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Seaview Inn

What is Seaview Inn’s food hygiene rating?

Seaview Inn has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 19 June 2025.

When was Seaview Inn last inspected?

Seaview Inn was last inspected by Cornwall on 19 June 2025.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.