Kathleen Renshaw

York

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Kathleen Renshaw scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 14 October 2019 by York.

What does this rating mean?

Kathleen Renshaw in York has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

134 East Parade,
York,
YO31 7YG

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Kathleen Renshaw. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Kathleen Renshaw?

Food hygiene at Kathleen Renshaw is inspected by York, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.york.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Kathleen Renshaw

What is Kathleen Renshaw’s food hygiene rating?

Kathleen Renshaw has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 14 October 2019.

When was Kathleen Renshaw last inspected?

Kathleen Renshaw was last inspected by York on 14 October 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.