Bunnymans Bunnychow

Hampshire

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Bunnymans Bunnychow scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

What does this rating mean?

Bunnymans Bunnychow in Hampshire has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

4 Woodpeckers Drive,
Winchester,
Hampshire,
SO22 5JJ

Bunnymans Bunnychow Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Bunnymans Bunnychow. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Bunnymans Bunnychow?

Food hygiene at Bunnymans Bunnychow is inspected by Winchester City, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.winchester.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Bunnymans Bunnychow

What is Bunnymans Bunnychow’s food hygiene rating?

Bunnymans Bunnychow has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 12 August 2018.

When was Bunnymans Bunnychow last inspected?

Bunnymans Bunnychow was last inspected by Winchester City on 12 August 2018.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.