Peoples Place

LONDON

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Peoples Place scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 31 August 2021 by Westminster.

What does this rating mean?

Peoples Place in LONDON has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

138 REGENT STREET,
LONDON,
W1B 5SG

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Peoples Place. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Peoples Place?

Food hygiene at Peoples Place is inspected by Westminster, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.westminster.gov.uk/ or [email protected].

Questions about Peoples Place

What is Peoples Place’s food hygiene rating?

Peoples Place has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 31 August 2021.

When was Peoples Place last inspected?

Peoples Place was last inspected by Westminster on 31 August 2021.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.