Paxtons Head

LONDON

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Paxtons Head scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Very good Cleanliness & condition Very good Confidence in management Very good

Last inspected on 18 January 2024 by Westminster.

What does this rating mean?

Paxtons Head in LONDON has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

153 KNIGHTSBRIDGE,
LONDON,
SW1X 7PA

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Paxtons Head. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Paxtons Head?

Food hygiene at Paxtons Head is inspected by Westminster, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.westminster.gov.uk/ or [email protected].

Questions about Paxtons Head

What is Paxtons Head’s food hygiene rating?

Paxtons Head has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 18 January 2024.

When was Paxtons Head last inspected?

Paxtons Head was last inspected by Westminster on 18 January 2024.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.