Nisa Local

Sandfields

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Nisa Local scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Very good Cleanliness & condition Generally satisfactory Confidence in management Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 28 March 2019 by Swansea.

What does this rating mean?

Nisa Local in Sandfields has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

6 St Helens Road,
Sandfields,
SA1 4AN

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Nisa Local. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Nisa Local?

Food hygiene at Nisa Local is inspected by Swansea, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.swansea.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Nisa Local

What is Nisa Local’s food hygiene rating?

Nisa Local has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 28 March 2019.

When was Nisa Local last inspected?

Nisa Local was last inspected by Swansea on 28 March 2019.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.