Prince Of India

Kent

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Prince Of India scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 22 March 2019 by Swale.

What does this rating mean?

Prince Of India in Kent has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

70 Preston Street,
Faversham,
Kent,
ME13 8PA

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Prince Of India. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Prince Of India?

Food hygiene at Prince Of India is inspected by Swale, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.swale.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Prince Of India

What is Prince Of India’s food hygiene rating?

Prince Of India has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 22 March 2019.

When was Prince Of India last inspected?

Prince Of India was last inspected by Swale on 22 March 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.