Banks Restaurant

Sheerness

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Banks Restaurant scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 2 December 2021 by Swale.

What does this rating mean?

Banks Restaurant in Sheerness has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

428 Minster Road,
Minster-on-sea,
Sheerness,
Kent,
ME12 3NZ

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Banks Restaurant. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Banks Restaurant?

Food hygiene at Banks Restaurant is inspected by Swale, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.swale.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Banks Restaurant

What is Banks Restaurant’s food hygiene rating?

Banks Restaurant has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 2 December 2021.

When was Banks Restaurant last inspected?

Banks Restaurant was last inspected by Swale on 2 December 2021.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.