Seoul tokyo

Borough High Street

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Seoul tokyo scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 13 April 2026 by Southwark.

What does this rating mean?

Seoul tokyo in Borough High Street has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

168,
Borough High Street,
London,
SE1 1LB

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Seoul tokyo. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Seoul tokyo?

Food hygiene at Seoul tokyo is inspected by Southwark, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.southwark.gov.uk/ or [email protected].

Questions about Seoul tokyo

What is Seoul tokyo’s food hygiene rating?

Seoul tokyo has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 13 April 2026.

When was Seoul tokyo last inspected?

Seoul tokyo was last inspected by Southwark on 13 April 2026.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.