Magdy Shop

Essex

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Magdy Shop scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 18 June 2024 by Southend-On-Sea.

What does this rating mean?

Magdy Shop in Essex has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

138 Sutton Road,
Southend-on-sea,
Essex,
SS2 5ER

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Magdy Shop. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Magdy Shop?

Food hygiene at Magdy Shop is inspected by Southend-On-Sea, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.southend.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Magdy Shop

What is Magdy Shop’s food hygiene rating?

Magdy Shop has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 18 June 2024.

When was Magdy Shop last inspected?

Magdy Shop was last inspected by Southend-On-Sea on 18 June 2024.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.