No.14 St Marys Hill

Stamford

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

No.14 St Marys Hill scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

What does this rating mean?

No.14 St Marys Hill in Stamford has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

14 St Marys Hill,
Stamford,
Lincolnshire,
PE9 2DP

No.14 St Marys Hill Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for No.14 St Marys Hill. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects No.14 St Marys Hill?

Food hygiene at No.14 St Marys Hill is inspected by South Kesteven, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.southkesteven.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about No.14 St Marys Hill

What is No.14 St Marys Hill’s food hygiene rating?

No.14 St Marys Hill has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 18 November 2021.

When was No.14 St Marys Hill last inspected?

No.14 St Marys Hill was last inspected by South Kesteven on 18 November 2021.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.