Cooksons Bridge

Litherland

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Cooksons Bridge scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Good

Last inspected on 21 December 2020 by Sefton.

What does this rating mean?

Cooksons Bridge in Litherland has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Cooksons Bridge,
Gorsey Lane,
Litherland,
Merseyside,
L21 0EJ

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Cooksons Bridge. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Cooksons Bridge?

Food hygiene at Cooksons Bridge is inspected by Sefton, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.sefton.gov.uk/ or [email protected].

Questions about Cooksons Bridge

What is Cooksons Bridge’s food hygiene rating?

Cooksons Bridge has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 21 December 2020.

When was Cooksons Bridge last inspected?

Cooksons Bridge was last inspected by Sefton on 21 December 2020.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.