Bricklayers Arms

Salford

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Bricklayers Arms scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good

Last inspected on 12 December 2018 by Salford.

What does this rating mean?

Bricklayers Arms in Salford has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Bricklayers Arms,
146-148 Ordsall Lane,
Salford,
M5 4TF

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Bricklayers Arms. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Bricklayers Arms?

Food hygiene at Bricklayers Arms is inspected by Salford, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.salford.gov.uk/envhealth.htm or [email protected].

Questions about Bricklayers Arms

What is Bricklayers Arms’s food hygiene rating?

Bricklayers Arms has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 12 December 2018.

When was Bricklayers Arms last inspected?

Bricklayers Arms was last inspected by Salford on 12 December 2018.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.