Ed's Kitchen

Bexhill

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Ed's Kitchen scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 16 January 2025 by Rother.

What does this rating mean?

Ed's Kitchen in Bexhill has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

124 Cooden Drive,
Bexhill,
East Sussex,
TN39 3AW

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Ed's Kitchen. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Ed's Kitchen?

Food hygiene at Ed's Kitchen is inspected by Rother, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.rother.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Ed's Kitchen

What is Ed's Kitchen’s food hygiene rating?

Ed's Kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 16 January 2025.

When was Ed's Kitchen last inspected?

Ed's Kitchen was last inspected by Rother on 16 January 2025.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.