The Maples Day Centre

Reading

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The Maples Day Centre scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

What does this rating mean?

The Maples Day Centre in Reading has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Richfield Avenue,
Reading,
RG1 8EQ

The Maples Day Centre Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Maples Day Centre. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Maples Day Centre?

Food hygiene at The Maples Day Centre is inspected by Reading, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.reading.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about The Maples Day Centre

What is The Maples Day Centre’s food hygiene rating?

The Maples Day Centre has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 12 November 2019.

When was The Maples Day Centre last inspected?

The Maples Day Centre was last inspected by Reading on 12 November 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.