The Royal Standard

Oxford

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The Royal Standard scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good

Last inspected on 26 July 2019 by Oxford City.

What does this rating mean?

The Royal Standard in Oxford has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

78 London Road,
Headington,
Oxford,
Oxfordshire,
OX3 9AJ

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Royal Standard. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Royal Standard?

Food hygiene at The Royal Standard is inspected by Oxford City, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.oxford.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about The Royal Standard

What is The Royal Standard’s food hygiene rating?

The Royal Standard has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 26 July 2019.

When was The Royal Standard last inspected?

The Royal Standard was last inspected by Oxford City on 26 July 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.