Pacers Bar

Northumberland

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Pacers Bar scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 26 March 2018 by Northumberland.

What does this rating mean?

Pacers Bar in Northumberland has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

First Row,
Linton,
Northumberland,
NE61 5SE

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Pacers Bar. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Pacers Bar?

Food hygiene at Pacers Bar is inspected by Northumberland, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.northumberland.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Pacers Bar

What is Pacers Bar’s food hygiene rating?

Pacers Bar has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 26 March 2018.

When was Pacers Bar last inspected?

Pacers Bar was last inspected by Northumberland on 26 March 2018.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.