Thorpland House

Norfolk

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Thorpland House scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 13 August 2015 by North Norfolk.

What does this rating mean?

Thorpland House in Norfolk has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

12 Thorpland Road,
Fakenham,
Norfolk,
NR21 8JQ

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Thorpland House. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Thorpland House?

Food hygiene at Thorpland House is inspected by North Norfolk, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.northnorfolk.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Thorpland House

What is Thorpland House’s food hygiene rating?

Thorpland House has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 13 August 2015.

When was Thorpland House last inspected?

Thorpland House was last inspected by North Norfolk on 13 August 2015.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.