The Cross at Croscombe

Croscombe

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The Cross at Croscombe scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

What does this rating mean?

The Cross at Croscombe in Croscombe has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

The Cross,
Long Street,
Croscombe,
Wells,
BA5 3QJ

The Cross at Croscombe Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Cross at Croscombe. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Cross at Croscombe?

Food hygiene at The Cross at Croscombe is inspected by Mendip, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.mendip.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about The Cross at Croscombe

What is The Cross at Croscombe’s food hygiene rating?

The Cross at Croscombe has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 14 May 2019.

When was The Cross at Croscombe last inspected?

The Cross at Croscombe was last inspected by Mendip on 14 May 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.