Sams Chop House

Manchester

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Sams Chop House scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Good

Last inspected on 3 February 2017 by Manchester.

What does this rating mean?

Sams Chop House in Manchester has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Sams Chop House,
Chapel Walks,
Manchester,
M2 1HN

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Sams Chop House. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Sams Chop House?

Food hygiene at Sams Chop House is inspected by Manchester, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.manchester.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Sams Chop House

What is Sams Chop House’s food hygiene rating?

Sams Chop House has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 3 February 2017.

When was Sams Chop House last inspected?

Sams Chop House was last inspected by Manchester on 3 February 2017.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.