Laurel Court

Manchester

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Laurel Court scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 6 November 2018 by Manchester.

What does this rating mean?

Laurel Court in Manchester has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

1A Candleford Road,
Manchester,
M20 3JH

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Laurel Court. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Laurel Court?

Food hygiene at Laurel Court is inspected by Manchester, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.manchester.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Laurel Court

What is Laurel Court’s food hygiene rating?

Laurel Court has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 6 November 2018.

When was Laurel Court last inspected?

Laurel Court was last inspected by Manchester on 6 November 2018.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.