Carpenters Arms

Essex

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Carpenters Arms scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Generally satisfactory Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 12 May 2021 by Maldon.

What does this rating mean?

Carpenters Arms in Essex has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

33 Gate Street,
Maldon,
Essex,
CM9 5QF

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Carpenters Arms. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Carpenters Arms?

Food hygiene at Carpenters Arms is inspected by Maldon, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.maldon.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Carpenters Arms

What is Carpenters Arms’s food hygiene rating?

Carpenters Arms has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 12 May 2021.

When was Carpenters Arms last inspected?

Carpenters Arms was last inspected by Maldon on 12 May 2021.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.