Radcliffe Arms

Huddersfield

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Radcliffe Arms scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Cleanliness & condition Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 13 December 2016 by Kirklees.

What does this rating mean?

Radcliffe Arms in Huddersfield has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

59 Westgate,
Almondbury,
Huddersfield,
HD5 8XF

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Radcliffe Arms. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Radcliffe Arms?

Food hygiene at Radcliffe Arms is inspected by Kirklees, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/ or [email protected].

Questions about Radcliffe Arms

What is Radcliffe Arms’s food hygiene rating?

Radcliffe Arms has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 13 December 2016.

When was Radcliffe Arms last inspected?

Radcliffe Arms was last inspected by Kirklees on 13 December 2016.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.