Hadfields

Paddock

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Hadfields scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Generally satisfactory Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 9 July 2019 by Kirklees.

What does this rating mean?

Hadfields in Paddock has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Paddock Patisserie,
154 Luck Lane,
Paddock,
Huddersfield,
HD1 4RA

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Hadfields. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Hadfields?

Food hygiene at Hadfields is inspected by Kirklees, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/ or [email protected].

Questions about Hadfields

What is Hadfields’s food hygiene rating?

Hadfields has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 9 July 2019.

When was Hadfields last inspected?

Hadfields was last inspected by Kirklees on 9 July 2019.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.