Temptations

Islington

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Temptations scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 27 September 2018 by Islington.

What does this rating mean?

Temptations in Islington has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Temptations,
25-27 Highbury Corner,
Islington,
London,
N5 1RA

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Temptations. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Temptations?

Food hygiene at Temptations is inspected by Islington, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.islington.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Temptations

What is Temptations’s food hygiene rating?

Temptations has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 27 September 2018.

When was Temptations last inspected?

Temptations was last inspected by Islington on 27 September 2018.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.