Bay of Bengal

Suffolk

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Bay of Bengal scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Generally satisfactory Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 30 March 2019 by Ipswich.

What does this rating mean?

Bay of Bengal in Suffolk has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

324 Nacton Road,
Ipswich,
Suffolk,
IP3 9NA

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Bay of Bengal. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Bay of Bengal?

Food hygiene at Bay of Bengal is inspected by Ipswich, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.ipswich.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Bay of Bengal

What is Bay of Bengal’s food hygiene rating?

Bay of Bengal has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 30 March 2019.

When was Bay of Bengal last inspected?

Bay of Bengal was last inspected by Ipswich on 30 March 2019.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.