Takeaway/sandwich shop 📍 Hyndburn

Rios

Lancashire

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Rios scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Generally satisfactory Cleanliness & condition Very good Confidence in management Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 9 December 2024 by Hyndburn.

What does this rating mean?

Rios in Lancashire has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

7-8 Barnes Square,
Clayton Le Moors,
Lancashire,
BB5 5NX

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Rios. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Rios?

Food hygiene at Rios is inspected by Hyndburn, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Rios

What is Rios’s food hygiene rating?

Rios has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 9 December 2024.

When was Rios last inspected?

Rios was last inspected by Hyndburn on 9 December 2024.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.