Chic-King

Hartlepool

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Chic-King scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Generally satisfactory

Last inspected on 12 November 2024 by Hartlepool.

What does this rating mean?

Chic-King in Hartlepool has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

36 Catcote Road,
Hartlepool,
TS25 4HG

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Chic-King. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Chic-King?

Food hygiene at Chic-King is inspected by Hartlepool, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.hartlepool.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Chic-King

What is Chic-King’s food hygiene rating?

Chic-King has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 12 November 2024.

When was Chic-King last inspected?

Chic-King was last inspected by Hartlepool on 12 November 2024.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.