Lulus Cake Kitchen

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Lulus Cake Kitchen scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 23 June 2021 by Hart.

What does this rating mean?

Lulus Cake Kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Lulus Cake Kitchen. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Lulus Cake Kitchen?

Food hygiene at Lulus Cake Kitchen is inspected by Hart, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at https://www.hart.gov.uk/environment/environmental-health or [email protected].

Questions about Lulus Cake Kitchen

What is Lulus Cake Kitchen’s food hygiene rating?

Lulus Cake Kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 23 June 2021.

When was Lulus Cake Kitchen last inspected?

Lulus Cake Kitchen was last inspected by Hart on 23 June 2021.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.