1771 Swalwell

Swalwell

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

1771 Swalwell scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 13 February 2025 by Gateshead.

What does this rating mean?

1771 Swalwell in Swalwell has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Hexham Road,
Swalwell,
Whickham,
NE16 3AA

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for 1771 Swalwell. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects 1771 Swalwell?

Food hygiene at 1771 Swalwell is inspected by Gateshead, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.gateshead.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about 1771 Swalwell

What is 1771 Swalwell’s food hygiene rating?

1771 Swalwell has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 13 February 2025.

When was 1771 Swalwell last inspected?

1771 Swalwell was last inspected by Gateshead on 13 February 2025.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.