Kings Park

Eastbourne

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Kings Park scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Very good Cleanliness & condition Very good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 4 February 2025 by Eastbourne.

What does this rating mean?

Kings Park in Eastbourne has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

1 Shannon Way,
Eastbourne,
East Sussex,
BN23 6UA

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Kings Park. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Kings Park?

Food hygiene at Kings Park is inspected by Eastbourne, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at https://www.lewes-eastbourne.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Kings Park

What is Kings Park’s food hygiene rating?

Kings Park has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 4 February 2025.

When was Kings Park last inspected?

Kings Park was last inspected by Eastbourne on 4 February 2025.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.