The Dog at Wingham

Wingham

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The Dog at Wingham scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 3 June 2021 by Dover.

What does this rating mean?

The Dog at Wingham in Wingham has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

The Dog Inn,
Canterbury Road,
Wingham,
Kent,
CT3 1BB

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Dog at Wingham. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Dog at Wingham?

Food hygiene at The Dog at Wingham is inspected by Dover, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.dover.gov.uk/ or [email protected].

Questions about The Dog at Wingham

What is The Dog at Wingham’s food hygiene rating?

The Dog at Wingham has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 3 June 2021.

When was The Dog at Wingham last inspected?

The Dog at Wingham was last inspected by Dover on 3 June 2021.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.