Outdoor Food Courts

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Outdoor Food Courts scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 4 December 2017 by Doncaster.

What does this rating mean?

Outdoor Food Courts has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Outdoor Food Courts Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Outdoor Food Courts. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Outdoor Food Courts?

Food hygiene at Outdoor Food Courts is inspected by Doncaster, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.doncaster.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Outdoor Food Courts

What is Outdoor Food Courts’s food hygiene rating?

Outdoor Food Courts has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 4 December 2017.

When was Outdoor Food Courts last inspected?

Outdoor Food Courts was last inspected by Doncaster on 4 December 2017.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.