The Masons Arms

Chorley

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The Masons Arms scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 29 October 2020 by Chorley.

What does this rating mean?

The Masons Arms in Chorley has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Masons Arms,
98 Harpers Lane,
Chorley,
PR6 0HU

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Masons Arms. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Masons Arms?

Food hygiene at The Masons Arms is inspected by Chorley, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.chorley.gov.uk/foodratings or [email protected].

Questions about The Masons Arms

What is The Masons Arms’s food hygiene rating?

The Masons Arms has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 29 October 2020.

When was The Masons Arms last inspected?

The Masons Arms was last inspected by Chorley on 29 October 2020.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.