The Eagle Hotel

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The Eagle Hotel scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 29 November 2011 by Chorley.

What does this rating mean?

The Eagle Hotel has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

122 Bolton Street,
Chorley,
PR7 3DX

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The Eagle Hotel. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The Eagle Hotel?

Food hygiene at The Eagle Hotel is inspected by Chorley, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.chorley.gov.uk/foodratings or [email protected].

Questions about The Eagle Hotel

What is The Eagle Hotel’s food hygiene rating?

The Eagle Hotel has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 29 November 2011.

When was The Eagle Hotel last inspected?

The Eagle Hotel was last inspected by Chorley on 29 November 2011.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.