Lucky Ume

Gloucestershire

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Lucky Ume scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Very good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 11 November 2025 by Cheltenham.

What does this rating mean?

Lucky Ume in Gloucestershire has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

276 High Street,
Cheltenham,
Gloucestershire,
GL50 3HQ

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Lucky Ume. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Lucky Ume?

Food hygiene at Lucky Ume is inspected by Cheltenham, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.cheltenham.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Lucky Ume

What is Lucky Ume’s food hygiene rating?

Lucky Ume has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 11 November 2025.

When was Lucky Ume last inspected?

Lucky Ume was last inspected by Cheltenham on 11 November 2025.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.