Sweet Treats

Kent

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Sweet Treats scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Very good Cleanliness & condition Good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 1 August 2024 by Canterbury City.

What does this rating mean?

Sweet Treats in Kent has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

2 Horsebridge Road,
Whitstable,
Kent,
CT5 1AF

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Sweet Treats. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Sweet Treats?

Food hygiene at Sweet Treats is inspected by Canterbury City, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.canterbury.gov.uk.

Questions about Sweet Treats

What is Sweet Treats’s food hygiene rating?

Sweet Treats has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 1 August 2024.

When was Sweet Treats last inspected?

Sweet Treats was last inspected by Canterbury City on 1 August 2024.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.