Woodfields Day Nursery

Bury

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Woodfields Day Nursery scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

What does this rating mean?

Woodfields Day Nursery in Bury has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

17 Buckley Street,
Bury,
Greater Manchester,
BL9 5AF

Woodfields Day Nursery Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Woodfields Day Nursery. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Woodfields Day Nursery?

Food hygiene at Woodfields Day Nursery is inspected by Bury, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.bury.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Woodfields Day Nursery

What is Woodfields Day Nursery’s food hygiene rating?

Woodfields Day Nursery has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 5 February 2019.

When was Woodfields Day Nursery last inspected?

Woodfields Day Nursery was last inspected by Bury on 5 February 2019.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.