Whiteleaf Care

Bucks

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Whiteleaf Care scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 18 January 2014 by Buckinghamshire.

What does this rating mean?

Whiteleaf Care in Bucks has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

215 Hughenden Road,
High Wycombe,
Bucks,
HP13 5PG

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Whiteleaf Care. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Whiteleaf Care?

Food hygiene at Whiteleaf Care is inspected by Buckinghamshire, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.buckinghamshire.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Whiteleaf Care

What is Whiteleaf Care’s food hygiene rating?

Whiteleaf Care has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 18 January 2014.

When was Whiteleaf Care last inspected?

Whiteleaf Care was last inspected by Buckinghamshire on 18 January 2014.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.