Little Oaks Nursery

Nottinghamshire

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Little Oaks Nursery scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

What does this rating mean?

Little Oaks Nursery in Nottinghamshire has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

92 High Street,
Kimberley,
Nottinghamshire,
NG16 2PD

Little Oaks Nursery Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Little Oaks Nursery. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Little Oaks Nursery?

Food hygiene at Little Oaks Nursery is inspected by Broxtowe, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.broxtowe.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Little Oaks Nursery

What is Little Oaks Nursery’s food hygiene rating?

Little Oaks Nursery has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 29 November 2018.

When was Little Oaks Nursery last inspected?

Little Oaks Nursery was last inspected by Broxtowe on 29 November 2018.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.